Search  
Board and Staff
Our Policies & Issues
Links to Key Government Sites
Newsletters
Press Releases
Council Awards
Calendar
Member Meetings
Banquet
Agri-Celebration
Golf Tournament
Hokie Hooray
Town Hall Meetings
Membership Information
Membership Directory
Members Only
VDACS Weights & Measures Inspection Program

Home --> Our Policies & Issues --> VDACS Weights & Measures Inspection Program

The following message was sent to Virginia General Assembly members on March 25, 2009, asking for their support of the Governor's veto of the budget item that would privatize the VDACS Weights & Measures Inspection Program.


Dear Delegate/Senator:

We ask for your support of the Governor’s anticipated veto of Budget Item #98.

We are pleased that indications from Governor Kaine’s office are that he will likely veto the budget item that calls for the privatization of the Weights and Measures Inspection Program currently administered by the Virginia Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (VDACS).

The General Assembly’s last minute policy decision to privatize the state’s consumer protection program and include it in the budget conference report was done without any discussion with the many impacted industries. Such action did not allow for proper examination of the impacts on commerce in the Commonwealth, on the business interests that fuel our economy, and on the consumers who may lose even more confidence in today’s economic climate.

Within our agribusiness community there are numerous businesses and farmers who use thousands of devices to accurately buy from and sell products to other businesses and consumers. The impact of privatization would be significant.

  1. Without a State inspection program, it will be difficult to maintain the same integrity and reliability of commercial transactions. Consumers and businesses may no longer have confidence in the accuracy of the products they purchase. No other States have taken this action.
  2. While a fair number of agribusinesses already use private service companies to check their weights and measures devices, this practice is in addition to VDACS inspections which provide an important check on the work of the private sector.
  3. There are many unanswered questions related to privatization of the program. Are there sufficient private service companies in Virginia to accommodate the significant increase in required inspections? Are these private businesses reliable, properly trained, and certified?  How would consumer complaints be handled? 
  4. The increased cost to agribusinesses, including farmers, could be substantial. Many of the devices are located in rural areas not regularly visited by private service companies. A visit to inspect a single scale is estimated to cost hundreds of dollars recognizing the required travel time, equipment, and expertise for specialized devices.
  5. The U. S. Department of Agriculture requires that scales for the export of grain have a VDACS inspection. Private sector inspectors are not accepted.

The Virginia Agribusiness Council is willing to participate in a study by VDACS to fully discuss future program funding and whether the private sector can be utilized.

We ask you to uphold the Governor’s anticipated veto of Budget Item #98. We look forward to hearing that you will support this action. Please contact us if you need further information. Thank you.

(Additional information: “Calculate the Benefits During Weights & Measures Week, March 1-7” Press Release)

Sincerely,

Donna Pugh Johnson, President




 

 Virginia Agribusiness Council
 P. O. Box 718
701 East Franklin Street, Suite 503
Richmond, VA 23218
Phone: (804) 643-3555   Fax: (804) 643-3556  E-mail: va.agribusiness@att.net

National Issues & Congressional Visits Survey (members only)

Summary of Recent Accomplishments

Legislator Voting Records Report

2010 Policy on State Issues

Virginia Agriculture & Forestry Initiative 2007-2008 - State Issues

VDACS Weights & Measures Inspection Program

Policy on National Issues

Chesapeake Bay TMDL Briefing Paper - June, 2010

Position on Chesapeake Bay Presidential Executive Order

Position on Chesapeake Bay Program Reauthorization

Position on Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs)

Media Release - H.R. 5509 (June 11, 2010)

Industry Letter on Chesapeake Bay Executive Order Guidance - April 2010

Council Letter on TMDL to EPA - Dec 2009

Council Letter on Chesapeake Bay Reauthorization (H.R. 3852) - Dec 2009

Industry Letter on Chesapeake Bay Reauthorization (S 1816) - Nov 2009

Council Letter on Chesapeake Bay Reauthorization (S 1816) - Nov 2009

Sample Letter to Congress on Chesapeake Bay Program Reauthorization

Council Letter on OSC Oil & Gas Leasing Program

Joint Statement of Concerns & Principles on Proposed Nutrient Standards for FL

Agricultural Community Comments on EPA’s Proposed Water Quality Standards

Council Comments on Proposed H-2A Regulation Changes

Letter to Congress Regarding Hours of Service Legislation

Letter to USTR on China's Pork Ban

UEP Editorial - Reflections on California Ballot Initiative (Nov '08)